Community

On Orbit => Space Shuttle Mission Simulator (tm) => Topic started by: Admin on April 02, 2008, 04:02:26 PM

Title: Who wrote THAT review (on www.IGN.com!)
Post by: Admin on April 02, 2008, 04:02:26 PM
http://rr.pc.ign.com/rrview/pc/space_shuttle_mission_2007/964235/83594/

and

http://rr.pc.ign.com/rrview/pc/space_shuttle_mission_2007/964235/83824/

Anybody from the forum?

/Admin
Title: Re: Who wrote THAT review (on www.IGN.com!)
Post by: Glovepuppet on April 02, 2008, 07:36:19 PM
Well he certainly hit the nail on the head with that review.
Title: Re: Who wrote THAT review (on www.IGN.com!)
Post by: Yoti980 on April 02, 2008, 08:07:32 PM
yeah he did.. it was spot on!
Title: Re: Who wrote THAT review (on www.IGN.com!)
Post by: USA~Driver on April 03, 2008, 12:14:21 PM
WHAT?  ONLY A 9.8 ??!!  ;)  Congrats to the entire EXCITING SIMULATIONS team for an outstanding product.   :)
Title: Re: Who wrote THAT review (on www.IGN.com!)
Post by: Essin on April 03, 2008, 12:59:40 PM
Yeah, this sim is chock full of 0.2 points pure BADNESS!   ;D
Title: Re: Who wrote THAT review (on www.IGN.com!)
Post by: rokushakubo on April 03, 2008, 06:39:17 PM
With the greatest respect to the development team and without trying to incur anyone's wrath here, I think 98% is a little generous!  That implies the product is nearly perfect and could barely be improved upon.  It's a great sim and I thoroughly enjoy it, but I'm sure even the developers would agree that there are things that could be done a bit better - things that would bring the rating down a bit more than just 2%.

On the other hand, 9.8 is appropriate as it is (approximately) the acceleration due to gravity that the shuttle must overcome upon lift-off... ;)
Title: Re: Who wrote THAT review (on www.IGN.com!)
Post by: Admin on April 03, 2008, 08:17:31 PM
Reviews are ultimately also subjective even with the most professional reviewer.

As you correctly pointed out, there is always room for improvement everywhere. Following that thought, nobody should get a perfect 10 for any application - because it is impossible to satisfy everybody (since everybody is subjective). Then the question is: why decide that 10 is a maximum if it can never be achieved.

This is of course a philosophical question that is beyond the scope of this forum and it does not need an answer. Basically what I'm trying to say is that your 95% is somebody else's 100% and maybe vice versa.

What we're happy tough is that we got a rating above 9 <g>. No need to be greedy.

/Admin