Author Topic: Experimenting with STS-1  (Read 8664 times)

vinny002

  • Mission Specialist
  • ****
  • Posts: 407
Experimenting with STS-1
« on: May 17, 2010, 12:30:46 AM »
Hi, guys!!

I'm having a lot of fun with STS-1!! I got the space shuttle up to an altitude of 213 nautical mile perigee by 1,042 nautical mile apogee orbit!! I got the space shuttle up to an altitude of 1,042 nautical mile apogee orbit by using vernier RCS translation!!When the new features/mission pack comes out, I'm going to do the deorbit burn at 1,042 nautical mile apogee orbit to slow the space shuttle down using the OMS engines to get the perigee altitude of about 10 nautical miles? to reenter the earth's atmosphere!

        Cheers,
    Vincent
« Last Edit: May 17, 2010, 12:42:16 AM by Admin »

vinny002

  • Mission Specialist
  • ****
  • Posts: 407
Re: Experimenting with STS-1
« Reply #1 on: May 17, 2010, 04:04:44 AM »
Hi, guys!!

Ok, guys I got the space shuttle up to an altitude of 1,050 nautical mile perigee by 1,050 nautical mile apogee orbit and I've noticed that the earth is smaller up that high than at the lower orbit and as I climb to the apogee the earth is getting smaller as I climb away from it!! Very interesting!! When I got to the 1,050 nautical mile circular orbit I have only 7% RCS fuel remaining and I used up all of the OMS fuel!!

          Cheers,
      Vincent

Moonwalker

  • Shuttle Pilot
  • *****
  • Posts: 936
Re: Experimenting with STS-1
« Reply #2 on: May 17, 2010, 10:24:48 AM »
Keep watching the radiation levels of the Van Allen Belt ;D ;)

Huron_Serenity

  • Trainee
  • **
  • Posts: 81
Re: Experimenting with STS-1
« Reply #3 on: May 17, 2010, 11:03:18 AM »
You've lost the Shuttle and the crew; neither can survive reentry from that altitude. Well, maybe not so, since the Shuttle is supposedly capable of doing a skip reentry, but it has never actually been done in reality. I have no idea if SSM2007 could simulate a skip reentry, though.

You'll have to try to get a lower orbit and hope that NASA can get Challenger into service a couple years ahead of schedule. Even if they can't, still get to a lower orbit, so Challenger can bring the bodies of your crew home and attach a deorbit module onto Columbia, so she doesn't pose an orbital hazard in the future.

You did manage to break the apogee record set by Pete Conrad and Robert Gordon Jr. during Gemini XI by 200 nautical miles.
"It is better to light one candle than to curse the darkness."

vinny002

  • Mission Specialist
  • ****
  • Posts: 407
Re: Experimenting with STS-1
« Reply #4 on: May 17, 2010, 11:15:48 AM »
Hi, Moonwalker!!

What is the effects of radiation in the Van Allen belt? Thanks!

          Cheers,
       Vincent

Moonwalker

  • Shuttle Pilot
  • *****
  • Posts: 936
Re: Experimenting with STS-1
« Reply #5 on: May 17, 2010, 01:46:10 PM »
Hi, Moonwalker!!

What is the effects of radiation in the Van Allen belt? Thanks!

          Cheers,
       Vincent

It increases the risk of cancer and might damage some sensitive electronic equipment. It was no problem for the Apollo missions, since the flight through the Van Allen Belt on the way to the Moon takes barely an hour with an initial speed of about 11km/s. For longer duration within orbit, the Van Allen Belt and its anomalies should be avoided. But for SSM2007 you can feel reassured. I don't think the Van Allen Belt is simulated ;D

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Van_Allen_radiation_belt#Impact_on_space_travel
« Last Edit: May 17, 2010, 01:48:41 PM by Moonwalker »

Admin

  • Commander
  • Shuttle Pilot
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,730
  • Sic Itur Ad Astra
    • Space Shuttle Mission 2007 (tm)
Re: Experimenting with STS-1
« Reply #6 on: May 17, 2010, 02:37:35 PM »
<SIP>...

But for SSM2007 you can feel reassured. I don't think the Van Allen Belt is simulated ;D
<SNIP>...


We take no chances. Our software is well-shielded against the Van-Allen radiation.

Actually, the only radiation you get exposed to is what is considered "normal" on Earth :)

/Admin
- The Space Shuttle Mission 2007(tm)Team -

bradleyjs

  • Mission Specialist
  • ****
  • Posts: 372
Re: Experimenting with STS-1
« Reply #7 on: May 18, 2010, 02:51:27 AM »
Sounds like we live in a no-win situation - "normal" radiation... LOL :o

Remember, "failure is not an option" !

vinny002

  • Mission Specialist
  • ****
  • Posts: 407
Re: Experimenting with STS-1
« Reply #8 on: May 18, 2010, 06:58:29 AM »
Hi, guys!

Ok, guys now I got the space shuttle up to an altitude of 1,073 nautical mile circular orbit with only 2% RCS fuel remaining!! I'm having a lot of fun playing with the space shuttle on SSM!!!!!

      Cheers,
    Vincent

uri_ba

  • Moderator
  • Shuttle Pilot
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,079
  • Proudly Addicted!
    • SSM-fans Rulez! :)
Re: Experimenting with STS-1
« Reply #9 on: May 18, 2010, 03:20:43 PM »
and you are stuck up there, now what? :)
The SSM-fans sites:
Blog: http://blog.ssm-fans.info
Wiki: http://wiki.ssm-fans.info
The Image Pad: http://upload.ssm-fans.info
you can contact me at uri@ssm-fans.info

vinny002

  • Mission Specialist
  • ****
  • Posts: 407
Re: Experimenting with STS-1
« Reply #10 on: May 19, 2010, 04:43:19 AM »
Hi, guys!!

I guess I'm going to have to get some more rocket fuel and the way to do this is to crank down the window and look for a gas station what Jim Lovell said on Apollo 13!!!

         Cheers,
     Vincent

Huron_Serenity

  • Trainee
  • **
  • Posts: 81
Re: Experimenting with STS-1
« Reply #11 on: May 19, 2010, 05:29:48 PM »
Hi, guys!!

I guess I'm going to have to get some more rocket fuel and the way to do this is to crank down the window and look for a gas station what Jim Lovell said on Apollo 13!!!

         Cheers,
     Vincent

And figure out a way to refuel the OMS and RCS on orbit.
"It is better to light one candle than to curse the darkness."